Re: proposed triages



I've answered this already on IRC, still pasting it here for the
records.
Note that for those that I did not comment on I totally agree.

On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 03:27 +0000, kbenjamin Coplon wrote:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505995  obsolete

can you elaborate? did you retest it?

> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514106  fixed_in_stable
> (see it's duplicate
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554071#c4)

yes, perfect. please go ahead and close it, mentioning that comment 4 in
the other report, and asking the reporter to leave a comment if it's
still an issue in a recent version of brasero

> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578180  not_gnome (looks
> like a Ubuntu patch also version 2.26.0)

I'd add a comment explaining that we **assume** as per comment 2 that
it's an ubuntu-specific issue. so NOTGNOME is fine, but also ask if it's
still an issue in recent versions, just to be sure.

> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348316  "new" version 3.2x
> GNOME version "unversioned enhancement" os "all" importance "normal
> ,enhancement"

if you tested that this still doesn't exist in 3.2, all your proposed
changes sound good. I'd keep "OS = Linux" though, it's not really
important here.

> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389476 "new"
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438850 "new" UE version
> unspecified os all
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584893 "new"   version unspecified

I'd also reset the old Target Milestone to ---

> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438852 "new" os all
> milestone na GNOME ver UE

> what do you think so far?

Looks good! Thanks!

andre
-- 
mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]