Re: bug-buddy was branched silently some time ago



hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 06.12.2006, 12:39 +0100 schrieb Christian Kirbach:
> I'd say we require some automation here. I started work on some kind of  
> "exact-dup-finder" that could be of use
> to bugsquad and bug-buddy. Due to time and skill constraints I did no make  
> any progress yet.

but i'm happy to read that at least somebody is looking into this. :-)

> > 1) Warn the user that its software is 1 year old and should update

that's http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382076 , i guess.

i always get that warning here (suse 10.1) and i think it's a totally
stupid one, because the software i am running is NOT more than one year
old.
imho, this has to be checked manually on a per-app-basis and not against
the gnome version, for example by manually marking application versions
as "obsolete" in bugzilla.gnome.org and by checking this information
(yes, i know that this is not possible yet; and no, i won't code this, i
don't even know C - sorry).

> > 3) Check distribution version/release; if there are updates out there
> > don't allow to send if/ask for upgrade
> Some list could be manually maintained and checked by bug-buddy for this  
> purpose.

yes, also my favourite.

> > 4) Same as 3, but at package level
> The best way to do this is probably by using the package management system  
> provided by the distribution.

...which would require some interface guidelines for this.


on another note, we should reject bug reports containing totally empty
traces in bug-buddy already, see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383349 .
let's reduce the workload as early as possible.

andre

-- 
 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed!
 http://www.iomc.de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]