On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 15:56, Luis Villa wrote: > Hey, guys- > > Looks like a couple of bugzilla 'core' folks were looking for me and aes > last night to discuss b.g.o moving to 2.17 instead of 2.16. And of > course we totally missed each other, since I was on the plane and I > suppose aes was still recovering from exams. :) > > What's the situation? Greg mentioned specific features you think will > help us upgrade... I'd been listening for such things but had missed > them :) What specific things did you have in mind? I personally would > definitely love lots of the stuff that is in 2.17, but I think aes had > thought (and I agreed, since I'm not doing the work, he is) that the > delta was big enough that we'd have to throw out most of our current > work to do it. > Hey :-), If upgrading to 2.17 is quite painless, I'd be happy to do it. The thing is, to upgrade to 2.16, all we need to do is minor templatisation. That's _it_. I was going to do the final template stuff over the weekend, and I tested importing our database into the 2.16 system a couple of weeks ago, and it worked. My personal opinion is we should go for 2.16, then maybe look immediately at what we'd need to change for 2.17 since I presume that will be released as a stable 2.18 soon-ish. I might be making that up. However, I'd really like to hear what the bugzilla people have to say. Thanks, -- Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part