On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 17:25, Heather Flanagan wrote: > Hi all - > > couple of interesting things I see here > 1 - xscreensaver is a NOTGNOME thing. However, we don't exactly have > another place to really send it. > 2 - Even if the Gnome folks wanted to do something, there is no stack > trace to help them figure out why the thing is crashing. Not enough > detail to even figure out if there is a duplicate bug out there. > > So, all things duly considered, I'd probably do the following: > > Change the status to NEEDINFO > Request a stack trace > Indicate that this _isn't_ a gnome thing, but we can at least attempt > to look at it if we can get more information. > > Does that make sense? Or should this stick with a NOTGNOME status? > > -heather f. > (wench374) > http://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/bugs.html is where bugs should go. I'm sure this used to be on the non-gnome list, it seems to have vanished. Hmmmm. Regardless, I can't see much point in tracking bugs in our bugzilla until^H^H^H^H^Hunless we forked it. -- Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part