Re: Talking about "Where We Are At"

[Andrew Sobala <andrew sobala net>]

On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 19:51, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 06:50, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> > * GNOMEVER accumulating
> > 
> > Some bugs are triaged GNOMEVER2.0,GNOMEVER2.1,GNOMEVER2.3. Which is
> > ridiculous. I propose defining keywords as follows:
> [snip]
> 
> Huh, I was already using them this way, I sort of figured that everyone
> was.

Some people are, some people aren't.

> > * ui-review
> > 
> > FWIW, I just shunted all ui-review bugs to 2.3 because they will break
> > ui freeze.
> 
> I don't know that this is the right solution.  The release team website
> says -nothing- about post 2.2.0 releases.  That either means that you
> can't change anything for any releases past 2.2.0 (which seems silly,
> changes are the point of making a release), or that we need some more
> information about what "freezes" are in effect.  From what I remember of
> the 2.0.x release cycle, some UI changes did go in on the 2.2.x where x
> > 0 releases.  Does somebody want to mail the release team and/or DDL
> for some clarification?  If not, I can send the mail.

Um. I'll e-mail the release team.

-- 
Andrew <andrew sobala net>         ~~  IRC: aes @ irc.gnome.org
http://www.penguins-of-fire.co.uk  ~~  http://www.advogato.org/person/aes

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GS/M d--(-) s: a17 C++(+++) UL+ P++ L+++ E--- W+>++ N(-) o? K? w--(---) !O M V-
PS+ PE Y+ PGP+>++++ t@ 5-- X- R tv-@ b++++ DI+++ D>---- G- e- h! r--- y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------