Re: TARGET2.2.x?

[Andrew Sobala <andrew sobala net>]

Urm... <ping>!

Does anyone have any opinions on this?

On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 16:38, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> Hey dudes,
> 
> Should we have a TARGET2.2.x keyword for bugs that should be fixed in
> the 2.2.x series - and by 2.2.0 if possible but they are not so
> important as bugs with the TARGET2.2.0 keyword.
> 
> I thought of this when bug 102149 dropped into my inbox.
> 
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102149
> 
> It's not a 2.2.0 blocker, but it's broken in a usability sense.
> 
> What do you think?
-- 
                    Happy New Year,

                               Andrew

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GS/M d--(-) s: a17 C++(+++) UL+ P++ L+++ E--- W+>++ N(-) o? K? w--(---) !O M V-
PS+ PE Y+ PGP+>++++ t@ 5-- X- R tv-@ b++++ DI+++ D>---- G- e- h! r--- y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------