Re: [Fwd: Re: old balsa crashes/bugs]

[Andrew Sobala <andrew sobala net>]

I went through everything <=1.2.x and closed everything that looked
unfixable (taking into account that 1.2.x is unmaintained). I also
closed old NEEDINFO bugs.

Pawel: You may want to look at these bugs - they're the ones that I
didn't close for some reason. eg. patches attached, feature requests for
things that I don't know if are implemented... :

http://makeashorterlink.com/?Z1A732C32

PS. Sorry if I closed any valid bugs. I don't think I did...

On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 23:29, Luis Villa wrote:
> FYI, for those of you going through old 70K-series crashers.
> Luis
> 
> -----Forwarded Message-----
> 
> From: Pawel Salek <pawsa theochem kth se>
> To: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>
> Cc: B-maintainer <balsa-maintainer theochem kth se>
> Subject: Re: old balsa crashes/bugs
> Date: 24 Oct 2002 23:46:18 +0200
> 
> On 2002.10.23 04:55 Luis Villa wrote:
> > Are you guys going to be maintaining non-2.0 balsa for a while yet?
> > What should be done with the old bugs? [Just looking through old
> > unconfirmeds across all of bugzilla, and finding a few from balsa.]
> 
> We close 1.2.x bugs on the spot. 1.4.x series will be maintained for a 
> while, I think, it seems people are interested in it and I know that 
> GNOME1.4 (as in RH7.3) is going to stay few more month at my 
> department, too.
> 
> Pawel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
> Gnome-bugsquad gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
> 
-- 
Andrew

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GS/M d--(-) s: a17 C++(+++) UL+ P++ L+++ E--- W+>++ N(-) o? K? w--(---)
!O M V-
PS+ PE Y+ PGP+>++++ t@ 5-- X- R tv-@ b++++ DI+++ D>---- G- e- h! r--- y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------