Re: Guidelines 2nd draft
- From: Aschwin van der Woude <aschwin van der woude creanor com>
- To: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>
- Cc: "Bugsquad list (gnome)" <gnome-bugsquad gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Guidelines 2nd draft
- Date: 13 Nov 2002 10:30:06 +0200
> In the section about Gentoo and LFS, you say
>
> "Hopefully the reporter is killed enough to help pinpoint if the
> crash is really due to Gnome. Otherwise it is probably best to
> INVALID the bug."
>
> I think you meant to suggest the report was "kind", rather than
> "killed".
Whoops!! I changed it right away, it was meant to say 'skilled', and so
it does now.
> I don't like the phrasing of that whole section, since it should really
> be describing the larger problem of trying to work out if the problem is
> NOTGNOME or something else. But I didn't write the guidelines.
Could you give a shot at rewriting the section?
-A.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]