Re: simple but possibly important bugzilla keyword cleanup

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

Sorry for all this pain. I've dealt with the worst of the problems; some
reports still need to be updated for the new keywords, but bug
submission, comment addition, and queries should all be fixed. Please
let me know if you see anything amiss on any non-reports pages.
Luis

On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 15:17, Luis Villa wrote:
> Bugzilla will be going down briefly in the next few minutes in order to
> fix this problem. Humblest apologies.
> Luis
> 
> On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 14:00, Luis Villa wrote:
> > ARRRGGH. Note that due to a bug in bugzilla this has temporarily broken
> > addition of comments by people without permissions to bugs which have
> > one of the affected keywords. I'm trying to figure out the correct
> > SQL-foo to fix this ATM; hopefully it won't be too long.
> > 
> > Luis
> > 
> > On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 13:02, Luis Villa wrote:
> > > Changes done. Note that there are also new descriptions of TARGET* and
> > > GNOMEVER*; hopefully these will make things more clear for everyone.
> > > 
> > > Luis 
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 23:20, John Fleck wrote:
> > > > So is this going forward, Luis? If so, when?
> > > > John
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 23:48, Luis Villa wrote:
> > > > > After much discussion, the bugsquad would like to change some keywords
> > > > > around. Since currently I'm on the hook for about 95% of the uses of
> > > > > these keywords in bugzilla, I don't expect anyone will object to these
> > > > > much, but... I hope it'll make things more clear. If it doesn't, or if
> > > > > this would break scripts, or what have you, please speak up; I'll be
> > > > > changing them on Friday unless I hear otherwise.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Current keyword-> new keyword [explanation]
> > > > > 
> > > > > GNOME1.4 -> GNOVER1.4 
> > > > > GNOME2 -> GNOVER2.0
> > > > > GNOME2.1.x -> GNOVER2.1
> > > > > 
> > > > > These keywords have been used to indicate what version of GNOME the bug
> > > > > was found in. Hence, GNOVER_X_. Every bug in a package that is part of
> > > > > GNOME proper should get at least one of these three keywords at some
> > > > > point, or be closed as being too old if it is in GNOME < 1.4.
> > > > > 
> > > > > GNOME2.0.1->TARGET2.0.1
> > > > > GNOME2.0.2->TARGET2.0.2
> > > > > GNOME2.0.3->TARGET2.0.3
> > > > > GNOME2.1.2->TARGET2.1.2
> > > > > GNOME2.2.0->TARGET2.2.0
> > > > > 
> > > > > These keywords have been used like target milestones during the course
> > > > > of the 2.0 release process; refering to them as targets instead of just
> > > > > 'GNOME' should make their usage much more clear, I hope.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Also, by popular bug squad request (or more like frequent complaint)
> > > > > bug_squad will become bugsquad. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hope this is clear/useful- /please/ let me know ASAP if there is some
> > > > > problem with this. Hopefully it'll give us a schema that will work
> > > > > better going forward.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Luis
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > > > > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> > > > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gnome-hackers mailing list
> > > gnome-hackers gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-hackers mailing list
> > gnome-hackers gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
>