TARGET2.2.x?



Hey dudes,

Should we have a TARGET2.2.x keyword for bugs that should be fixed in
the 2.2.x series - and by 2.2.0 if possible but they are not so
important as bugs with the TARGET2.2.0 keyword.

I thought of this when bug 102149 dropped into my inbox.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102149

It's not a 2.2.0 blocker, but it's broken in a usability sense.

What do you think?

-- 
                    Happy New Year,

                               Andrew

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GS/M d--(-) s: a17 C++(+++) UL+ P++ L+++ E--- W+>++ N(-) o? K? w--(---) !O M V-
PS+ PE Y+ PGP+>++++ t@ 5-- X- R tv-@ b++++ DI+++ D>---- G- e- h! r--- y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]