Re: bugzilla.redhat.com bugs

[Andrew Sobala <andrew sobala net>]

On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 03:35, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I created a keyword MoveUpstream on https://bugzilla.redhat.com
> for bugs I plan to move to bugzilla.gnome.org
> 
> How would you guys prefer this to be done - you can query for
> MoveUpstream assigned to hp redhat com to get most of the gnome bugs
> to be moved. I am not likely to have time to search for dups before
> moving them. I can just file them all one day, and leave module
> maintainers to mark dups, or I can ignore them all, or other people
> could pull them from Red Hat bugzilla. I can go any way, just thought
> I'd give people a chance to voice an opinion.

I don't know what the "best" way to do this is, but I grabbed a couple
of control-center ones: bugs 79319 and 73540 @ b.r.c can be closed. And
I asked the reporter of 72612 @ b.r.c for more information before moving
that one to b.g.o.

Might be best just to send them all to the gnome bugzilla, and let us
mark duplicates once they're in our database, since otherwise the
transition would take ages.

-- 
Andrew

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GS/M d--(-) s: a17 C++(+++) UL+ P++ L+++ E--- W+>++ N(-) o? K? w--(---) !O M V-
PS+ PE Y+ PGP+>++++ t@ 5-- X- R tv-@ b++++ DI+++ D>---- G- e- h! r--- y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------