Re: [PATCH] Integrating BRLTTY with Gnopernicus (second version)



Hi Dave,

On Thursday 29 May 2003 13:35, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by Adi Dascal on May 29, 2003, at 13:00]
>
> >I am aware of what else is needed besides your patch,
>
> Excellent!
>
> >I've downloaded brltty_3.2.tar.gz
>
> For --enable-api to work, you need 3.3 (not officially released yet). To
> get it, read the repository section of BRLTTY's download page. IN short,
> though, it's a subversion repository. Check out
> svn://mielke.cc/main/brltty.
>
I don't have subversion yet - I am getting it right now.

> >adlib.o: In function `AL_evaluatePitch':
> >/home/adi/2DO/year2003/month05/2003.05.29/brltty-3.2/Programs/./adlib.c:11
> >0: undefined reference to `pow'
>
> For some reason, autoconf isn't picking up the need for -lm when linking.
> For a quick fix, modify the LDLIBS line in config.mk. For a permanent
> solution (and if you have the time), might you be able to figure out why
> the check for "sin" (as opposed to "pow") in configure.in isn't requiring
> libm on your system?
In the mean time I am trying to see why is happening this on my machine.
I guess it is happening because the library containg "sin" is not found; when 
I run configure I get the following message:

"checking for library containing sin... no",

BUT the configuration process does NOT complain in a "stop" manner (seems 
that this is not important so the configuration does not stop).
What should I do? What kind of library is this "libm" library? I do have 
libm.so.2.2.4 and a libm.so.6 which is a link to the first one on my system 
(RedHat 7.3), but seems that the "sim" symbol is not there.

Any ideea?

Thanks && Best regards,
Adi Dascal
BAUM Engineering, Romania

PS: BTW brltty-3.0 had no errors at make time, BUT in 3.0 there is no 
configure, so I could not get the libbrlapi that I need.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]