RE: Gnopernicus and redhat 8.0

[Marc Mulcahy <marc mulcahy sun com>]

Phoebe isn't so bad to build on, it just doesn't include Speakup, or at 
least, it didn't the last time I checked.  but as far as library 
compatibility, it's fine.

Marc


At 04:31 PM 3/24/2003 +0000, Bue Vester-Andersen wrote:
> Thomas/Bill:
>
> Thanks for the info so far. Hmm, it seems like I am in for trouble no matter
> what version of Redhat I choose.
>
> I have to use speakup to install and get up and running, so I think I can
> choose from Debian or Slackware. Has anyone had any luck with one of those?
> If not, then what should I choose to get up and running with gnopernicus?
>
> Sorry for bothering you on this subject.
>
> Best regards
> Bue
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gnome-accessibility-list-admin gnome org
> [mailto:gnome-accessibility-list-admin gnome org]On Behalf Of Thomas
> Ward
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 1:55 PM
> To: Bill Haneman
> Cc: listadr1 dkblind dk; gnome-accessibility-list gnome org;
> marc mulcahy sun com
> Subject: Re: Gnopernicus and redhat 8.0
>
>
> I've been having problems myself, but didn't have any luck with 8.0
> either.
> I'm beginning to wonder if this is a Red Hat thing.
> My only recommendation for 8.1 Phoebe is that Phoebe has newer libraries
> than 8.0, but unfortunately I am having little luck with either one.
> It would be a mersy if Red Hat could make rpms of gnopernicus for us to
> use and to use for testing purposes.
> Has anyone had any better luck building gnopernicus with Mandrake 9.1 Beta
> 2?
>
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Bill Haneman wrote:
>
> > Thomas/Bue:
> >
> > Phoebe has more up-to-date libraries, but Marc Mulcahy has reported
> problems building
> > and running gnopernicus on Phoebe.  Perhaps he can explain further.
> >
> > -Bill
> >
> > Thomas Ward said:
> >
> > >Hi, my recommendation is go for Phoebe.Phoebe has a bunch of newer Gnome
> > >libraries and other packages you would have to upgrade on 8.0 to get the
> > >remotest hope of compiling gnopernicus.
> > >
> > >
> > >On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Bue Vester-Andersen wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Has anyone succeeded in installing and running Gnopernicus on top of
> Redhat
> > >> 8.0? I have heard that it should be very difficult due to Redhat
> handling
> > >> the gnome environment a bit differently.
> > >>
> > >> Should I go for the beta of Phoebe instead?
> > >>
> > >> Best regards
> > >> Bue Vester-Andersen
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> > >> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> > >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> > >gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> > >http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
> >
> > ------
> > Bill Haneman x19279
> > Gnome Accessibility / Batik SVG Toolkit
> > Sun Microsystems Ireland
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> > gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list