RE: Gnopernicus and redhat 8.0

Phoebe isn't so bad to build on, it just doesn't include Speakup, or at least, it didn't the last time I checked. but as far as library compatibility, it's fine.


At 04:31 PM 3/24/2003 +0000, Bue Vester-Andersen wrote:

Thanks for the info so far. Hmm, it seems like I am in for trouble no matter
what version of Redhat I choose.

I have to use speakup to install and get up and running, so I think I can
choose from Debian or Slackware. Has anyone had any luck with one of those?
If not, then what should I choose to get up and running with gnopernicus?

Sorry for bothering you on this subject.

Best regards

-----Original Message-----
From: gnome-accessibility-list-admin gnome org
[mailto:gnome-accessibility-list-admin gnome org]On Behalf Of Thomas
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 1:55 PM
To: Bill Haneman
Cc: listadr1 dkblind dk; gnome-accessibility-list gnome org;
marc mulcahy sun com
Subject: Re: Gnopernicus and redhat 8.0

I've been having problems myself, but didn't have any luck with 8.0
I'm beginning to wonder if this is a Red Hat thing.
My only recommendation for 8.1 Phoebe is that Phoebe has newer libraries
than 8.0, but unfortunately I am having little luck with either one.
It would be a mersy if Red Hat could make rpms of gnopernicus for us to
use and to use for testing purposes.
Has anyone had any better luck building gnopernicus with Mandrake 9.1 Beta

On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Bill Haneman wrote:

> Thomas/Bue:
> Phoebe has more up-to-date libraries, but Marc Mulcahy has reported
problems building
> and running gnopernicus on Phoebe.  Perhaps he can explain further.
> -Bill
> Thomas Ward said:
> >Hi, my recommendation is go for Phoebe.Phoebe has a bunch of newer Gnome
> >libraries and other packages you would have to upgrade on 8.0 to get the
> >remotest hope of compiling gnopernicus.
> >
> >
> >On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Bue Vester-Andersen wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Has anyone succeeded in installing and running Gnopernicus on top of
> >> 8.0? I have heard that it should be very difficult due to Redhat
> >> the gnome environment a bit differently.
> >>
> >> Should I go for the beta of Phoebe instead?
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >> Bue Vester-Andersen
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> >> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> >gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> >
> ------
> Bill Haneman x19279
> Gnome Accessibility / Batik SVG Toolkit
> Sun Microsystems Ireland
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org

gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
gnome-accessibility-list gnome org

gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
gnome-accessibility-list gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]