Re: gnopernicus CVS and Debian

[Mario Lang <mlang delysid org>]

Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com> writes:

> Mario said...
>> No, those warnings were already appearing in 0.3.4 and even below
>> I think.  Actually those are reported because the version
>> of ATK in debian is not very new.  There is a wishlist bug
>> against atk if you want to read up on this issue.
>> 
>> > Will upgrading my atk fix this?
>> 
>> Yes, but then, you'll have to upgrade at-spi and gail too.
>
> Hi Mario: Thanks for helping get folks set up.  I am not sure that last
> statement is correct, ATK HEAD should be completely back-compatible with
> the previous version.

I am sorry for this confusion. 

> I _recommend_ updating gail and at-spi when possible because of bug
> fixes, but I do not believe that the dependencies are quite that
> interlocked,

To clarify, I was actually meaning that, gail and at-spi are not
very new in Debian, so if one was already going to update ATK, one
should probably also update gail and at-spi to get better results.

Thanks for your clarification.

-- 
CYa,
  Mario | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/>
        | Get my public key via finger mlang db debian org
        | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44