Re: some gnopernicus user questions



Hi.  At this point, I can't use the Mozilla build.  For some reason,
they don't provide the source code.  
All I can find are tar balls of binary files for several versions of
Redhat.  I don't run Redhat, so these files are useless to me.  Should I
consider this a bug?

          Kenny

On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 12:02:52PM +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
> Hi Kenny:
> 
> With respect to navigation and reading text in gnopernicus, you can use
> 'logical review mode' as well as "flat review" mode.  In logical review
> mode you can walk the user interface hierarchy and explore the
> individual elements, which can help you discover useful and/or
> interesting components in some applications.  Ideally applications will
> expose their useful functionality without requiring this kind of
> exploration, i.e. via keyboard navigation alone, but logical review can
> be a useful technique.
> 
> As for the Mozilla build Adi referred you to - please bear in mind that
> the ATK/at-spi support in the current Mozilla builds is not considered
> complete, so please bear that in mind when assessing it.  Bug reports
> are very welcome however.  You could send them to either the
> bugzilla.mozilla.org site or to the mozilla-accessibility mozilla org
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Bill
> 
> > > Use Mozilla, which you can take from:
> > > http://ftp24moz.newaol.com/pub/mozilla/accessibility/
> > > 
> > That sight only has binary files for Redhat.  I use Debian.  Where can I
> > get the source code or a Redhat RPM?  I would prefer source, but I can
> > use alien to convert a RPM to a deb  file. 
> > 
> >           Kenny
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> > gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
> 
> 
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]