Re: Icon love
- From: Larry Ewing <lewing ximian com>
- To: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- Cc: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>, Tuomas Kuosmanen <tigert ximian com>, carlos gnome-db org, gnome-hackers gnome org, jimmac ximian com, gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Icon love
- Date: 18 Jan 2002 15:25:04 -0600
Just as a data point I believe windows .ico format allows the icon
creator to add both an AND and a XOR mask to the icon for cases like
this. This also brings up a related issue that gdk-pixbuf's loader api
is completely insufficient to deal with something like .ico, that can
have both multiple resolutions and masks.
--Larry
On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 11:21, Jody Goldberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:19:48PM +0000, Bill Haneman wrote:
> > Generally icons should be themeable...
>
> > icons that have transparent backgrounds - one solution is to theme the icons which
> > solves the problem for dark backgrounds...
>
> It is only a solution for stock icons. If an app adds a new icon it
> is not feasible for a theme designer to anticipate and provide
> reverse video versions of every potential icon. I've proposed that
> for 2.1 we add a monochrome flag to icons, and a dark flag to
> themes. Then we can auto invert the colours as necessary. This
> won't solve all issues, but it should help.
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]