Re: [g-a-devel] status of cspi?



Cspi was marked for deprecation and python bindings are preferred. I
think your option b is the way to go.
I can elaborate more on this if you want me to.

ariel

2009/2/16 Mike Gorse <mgorse mgorse dhs org>:
> Hi all,
>
> As part of the Mono accessibility work that we are doing at Novell, we need
> to implement the UIA client api and bridge from at-spi.  This means that an
> AT written in UIA should have access to applications exposing information
> through atk.  As I see it, we have two options for using at-spi in C# /
> .net:
>
> (a) Use cspi, possibly writing a wrapper in C#, or
> (b) write a native C# binding for the dbus-based at-spi.
>
> Can someone here explain the situation with cspi?  I am under the impression
> that its usage is sort of discouraged, but I am unsure as to why.  Also, can
> someone explain the reasons for replacing python at-spi with pyatspi?  (I
> believe the former was similar to option A, but its use is deprecated.)  I'm
> just trying to investigate / gather information before we make a decision on
> how to proceed.
>
> Thanks,
> -Mike G-
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]