Re: [g-a-devel] [Accessibility-atspi] AT-SPI and D-Bus
- From: Samuel Thibault <samuel thibault ens-lyon org>
- To: Olaf Jan Schmidt <ojschmidt kde org>
- Cc: , accessibility-atspi freestandards org, gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] [Accessibility-atspi] AT-SPI and D-Bus
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:01:35 +0200
Olaf Jan Schmidt, le Fri 04 Aug 2006 12:06:57 +0200, a écrit :
> [ Samuel Thibault ]
> > I'm just wondering: can't any corba implementation (other than ORBit,
> > omniORB or TAO for instance) be used by Qt instead ?
>
> I don't know. KDE stopped using CORBA because the people dealing found it too
> complicated to work with. Our evaluation is that the effort to do this would
> certainly be greater than using D-Bus.
But less than using ORBit (and bare with bonobo dependency), right? That
might meet everyone's need: keep at-spi in a CORBA protocol, so that
gnome and Qt accessibility work together, but avoid ORBit dependencies.
> It would also be no solution for the libbonobo dependency.
I don't understand this. Doesn't Qt using another CORBA implementation
would let it be free from bonobo?
Samuel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]