Re: [g-a-devel] Re: OO.o / new a11y bridge ...
- From: Oliver Braun <Oliver Braun Sun COM>
- To: Willie Walker <William Walker Sun COM>
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] Re: OO.o / new a11y bridge ...
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:39:51 +0200
Willie Walker wrote:
If/when the code is incorporated, I'm curious about the following:
o Will there be regression tests to determine if the old (Java)
and new (direct) methods are the same?
are you talking about manual or automatic regression tests here ?
Well...that's up to you. ;-) The main concern I have is that the
event model, focus model, etc. (i.e., all the unspecified stuff in
the AT-SPI) remains somewhat consistent. If it changes, then one
might as well write a new script.
Sounds like such scripts are a perfect candidates for regression test ;-).
an assistive technology to determine versioning information so
a scripting screen reader can adapt appropriately?
The toolkit name should be sufficient here.
o If the old/new cannot be the same, will there be some way for
Sorry - I should have dug into the AT-SPI IDL more. One can actually
use toolkitName and version for these purposes.
No problem.
Regards,
Oliver
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]