Re: [g-a-devel] Re: OO.o / new a11y bridge ...

[Willie Walker <William Walker Sun COM>]

Hi All:

If/when the code is incorporated, I'm curious about the following:

  o Will there be regression tests to determine if the old (Java)
    and new (direct) methods are the same?

  o If the old/new cannot be the same, will there be some way for
    an assistive technology to determine versioning information so
    a scripting screen reader can adapt appropriately?

Will

On Oct 17, 2005, at 7:35 AM, Oliver Braun wrote:

> Hi George, Michael et al.,
>
> michael meeks wrote:
>
>
> > Hi George,
> >
> > On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 10:37 -0500, George Kraft wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Last April there were some good things said about Meeks' direct atk
> > > bridge for OO.  Has any work been done to incorporate it?  Could a
> > > bugzilla bug be created to track this?
> actually there is http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi? 
> id=47890, but it is not regulary updated for progress.
>
>
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-accessibility-devel/2005- 
> > > April/msg00023.html
> >
> >     Ah ;-)
> >
> >     So - it seems RH will actually be shipping this, since they  
> > have no
> > Java / a11y support for various reasons.
> >
> >     As such, I plan to use the code as a test case for an  
> > 'experimental'
> > feature that we can get into the main-line a lot sooner. It is still
> > really rather unready though ... ;-)
> I have to agree with Michael, the code is not ready for prime time  
> yet.
>
> Regards,
> Oliver
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel