Re: [g-a-devel]test-simple in at-spi
- From: "Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain sun com>
- To: bill haneman sun com, michael ximian com
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]test-simple in at-spi
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:45:21 +0000 (GMT)
> Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]test-simple in at-spi
> To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
> Cc: "Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain sun com>, accessibility mailing list
<gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 16:07, Bill Haneman wrote:
> > I think the root of the problem is that test-simple assumes, due to
> > historical accident, that it knows which widget implements AtkText and
> > assumes some things about that widget's state.
>
> That's a feature. It's a regression test designed to find nasty bugs -
> and this is precisely the kind of thing it's designed to catch - a
> missing Text interface where there used to be one :-)
>
What it was stumbling on was finding a Text interface on an object which
previously did not have one.
Padraig
> Just testing the reported interfaces is never going to catch some of
> the hard-core sillies that we should be checking. We need to expand
> test-simple to hard-code more expected behavior, rather than making it
> simply reflect what is there IMHO.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael.
>
> --
> mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]