Re: [g-a-devel]atk_image_get_image_position



Bill,

For button, we implement the AtkImage on the button rather than exposing the 
GtkImage itself. In this case the position returned by 
atk_image_get_image_position() will be the position of the image.

The other GAIL objects which implement AtkImage are GaiklArrow, GailImage, 
GailImageCell and GailPixmap. For these I would expect that the position 
returned by atk_image_get_image_position() would be the same as that returned by 
atk_component_get_position().

Padraig

> Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]atk_image_get_image_position
> To: "Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain sun com>
> Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> 
> On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 08:54, Padraig O'Briain wrote:
> > I am trying to figure out what this function should return and whether it 
should 
> > differ from atk_component_get_position. Currently we do not have any 
> > implementation for this function in GAIL. Should this function return the 
same 
> > value as atk_component_get_position()?
> 
> No, it should return the position of the contained image rather than the
> host component position.  So if there's an icon on a button, the icon's
> position (and extents, size, etc.) should be returned using the same
> coord type rules, etc. as for component.  Generally that means that
> image_position.x >= component_position.x, etc.
> 
> -Bill
> 
> > Padraig
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> > Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
> 
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]