Re: [g-a-devel]atk_image_get_image_position
- From: "Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain sun com>
- To: bill haneman sun com
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]atk_image_get_image_position
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 10:40:15 +0100 (BST)
Bill,
For button, we implement the AtkImage on the button rather than exposing the
GtkImage itself. In this case the position returned by
atk_image_get_image_position() will be the position of the image.
The other GAIL objects which implement AtkImage are GaiklArrow, GailImage,
GailImageCell and GailPixmap. For these I would expect that the position
returned by atk_image_get_image_position() would be the same as that returned by
atk_component_get_position().
Padraig
> Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]atk_image_get_image_position
> To: "Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain sun com>
> Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Mime-Version: 1.0
>
> On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 08:54, Padraig O'Briain wrote:
> > I am trying to figure out what this function should return and whether it
should
> > differ from atk_component_get_position. Currently we do not have any
> > implementation for this function in GAIL. Should this function return the
same
> > value as atk_component_get_position()?
>
> No, it should return the position of the contained image rather than the
> host component position. So if there's an icon on a button, the icon's
> position (and extents, size, etc.) should be returned using the same
> coord type rules, etc. as for component. Generally that means that
> image_position.x >= component_position.x, etc.
>
> -Bill
>
> > Padraig
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> > Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]