Re: [g-a-devel]A better solution ...

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

"Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain Sun COM> writes:

> > 
> > On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 16:08, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > > 	After some thought, and pacing up and down,
> > 
> > 	After talking to Owen, it seems that by far the best way is to avoid
> > the AtkObjectFactory by overriding GtkWidget's get_accessible, and leave
> > the ObjectFactory stuff for Gtk+ accessibility implementations only.
> > 
> 
> If you encounter an object, which is not a GtkWidget but is a GObject, for which 
> you want to provide an AtkObject you may need to revisit this.

I don't really see that this is relevant. If you have an arbitrary GObject,
you _can't_ get it's accessible by using the AtkObjectFactory, because this
doesn't preserve the one-to-one relationship between object and accessible.

Regards,
                                        Owen