Re: [g-a-devel]Accessibility support in Glade

[Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>]

Damon Chaplin wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 17:40, Bill Haneman wrote:
> > Damon Chaplin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 15:24, Bill Haneman wrote:
> > >
> > > > static const gchar* atk_object_name_property_parent =
> > > > "accessible-parent";
> > ...
> >
> > > Do you really need the <accessibility> child here?
> > >
> > > Wouldn't this be enough:
> > >
> > >   <atkproperty name="AtkObject:accessible-parent">widget1</atkproperty>
> >
> > Yes, you're right that this would be enough; but I don't agree with
> > using
> > the element's text content for the name here.  "target" attribute
> > semantics are probably a better choice.
> 
> Yes, it should probably be an attribute on the <accessibilty> tag, e.g.
> 
>   <accessibility parent="widget1">
>
> So the DTD would look like:
> 
> <!ELEMENT accessibility (atkrelation | atkaction | atkproperty)* >
> <!ATTLIST accessibility
>   parent IDREF #IMPLIED >
> 
> I hope it isn't too late to change the a11y parts of the DTD. Is anyone
> using nested <accessibility> tags in Glade XML files yet?

If this is a problem then we can punt it to 2.next;
I don't expect we'll need the "parent" property/attribute
frequently, and it will be hard to implement generically
anyhow in such as way as to assure that the targeted
"parent" knows about its new child.

-Bill
 
> Damon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel