Re: [g-a-devel]Accessibility support in Glade
- From: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- To: Damon Chaplin <damon ximian com>
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]Accessibility support in Glade
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:40:26 +0000
Damon Chaplin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 15:24, Bill Haneman wrote:
>
> > static const gchar* atk_object_name_property_parent =
> > "accessible-parent";
...
> Do you really need the <accessibility> child here?
>
> Wouldn't this be enough:
>
> <atkproperty name="AtkObject:accessible-parent">widget1</atkproperty>
Yes, you're right that this would be enough; but I don't agree with
using
the element's text content for the name here. "target" attribute
semantics are probably a better choice.
The <accessibility> property case is really only needed when specifying
other properties that don't necessarily have associated widgets, such as
the table properties I described in the previous email.
So I think that except for table captions, we can omit support for
<accessibility> values for <atkproperty> in 2.0.
regards,
Bill
> Would you really need to set atkproperties/actions/relations of the
> accessible-parent's AtkObject? Wouldn't they be set when the parent was
> created?
Yes, you're right here. That wasn't the intent of
specifying <accessibility> children here; it's only for the
edge case where a parent AtkObject is created which has no
backing widget (not a case we need to support yet).
> Damon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]