Re: [g-a-devel]not using oneway ...

[Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>]

On Mon, 2002-06-17 at 08:37, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> 
> 	One issue with not using oneway - which is the flip side to the
> problem, is that we are going to need methods to block re-enterancy
> during outgoing a11y calls. Gtk+ code [ and ~all client code ] is not
> designed to handle arbitrary re-enterancy through signal emission - or
> whatever hooks a11y is using.
> 
> 	So - Gtk+ apps will need some method to call
> 'ORBit_push/pop_no_reenter' to use around the notifyEvent call,
> otherwise we just added a highly uncontrolled incoming re-enterancy
> point...

Why is this a new issue with 'no oneway' ?  It's already the case with
key event notification.

It's not clear to me that we can do this.  I am a little alarmed to hear
this being raised at this late date.

-Bill

> 	Hmm;
> 
> 		Michael.
> 
> -- 
>  mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel