Re: [g-a-devel]Re: gail patch ...

["Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain Sun COM>]

Sorry to be so picky about this ...

I still do not understand how these functions will be used. Can you put gtk-doc 
comments in the functions? Is it intended that some programs or libraries will 
link against libgail, instead of using libgail as  GTK_MODULE?

I think we will need to install an include file gail.h which contains the 
definitions of the functions which are exported from libgail. I will do this 
when I understand how the functions will be used.

Please commit the change.

> 
> >  If so, should they be 
> > defined in an include file and how will the functions be used?
> 
> 	Suggest a sensible place for them - and we can put them there;
> currently libgnome doesn't depend on libgail in fact there is a rather
> inseparable gulf between them down to glib :-) Of course, to save
> replicating this in at-spi/atk-bridge we could put them in a gail header
> that we include there, but currently at-spi doesn't really depend on
> gail either so ...
> 
> 	This seems the only reasonable solution in the short term, so again,
> may I commit ?
> 
> 	Regards,
> 
> 		Michael.
> 
> -- 
>  mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
>