Re: [g-a-devel]gnome-mag patch take 2
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: David Bolter <david bolter utoronto ca>
- Cc: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>, accessibility mailing list <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]gnome-mag patch take 2
- Date: 16 Aug 2002 08:37:44 +0100
Hi David,
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 13:05, David Bolter wrote:
> i'm not clear on this namespacing issue in a C context -- is it a matter
> of prefixing functions? should we also have "registered" a namespace
> for the gok module? or are we talking specifically about idls (for
> shared libraries)?
This is mostly for the CORBA infrastructure, where it's most important
to have namespacing, since it's so un-constrained. In a single process
world, it's somewhat easier - you have control of all your symbols and
things that are linked in so there are few problems.
It is of course good style to namespace stuff anyway, typically methods
/ macros / types of application scope would have a gok_ / GOK_ / Gok
prefix, but for module internals this is not usually neccessary.
HTH,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]