Re: GAL vs gnome-2.0
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Jody Goldberg <jgoldberg home com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GAL vs gnome-2.0
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 19:52:13 -0700
On 19Sep2001 07:01PM (-0400), Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Also, it's by definition not conducive to a coherent platform (my
> favorite examples being the current location of gnome-vfs in the
> stack, and the previous location of gdk-pixbuf in the stack).
>
What's wrong with the current position of gnome-vfs? I don't
necessrily disagree with you but I haven't heard your theory on this
before.
- Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
