Re: GnomeModule, libglade

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:     
> so these libraries need to tell libglade which widgets they support,
> which can happen in the GnomeModule stuff i guess - except that like
> libgnomeui provides the GnomeModule for the canvas!  which seems totally
> broken.  
> 
> the fact that things like gnome-vfs's version are hard coded in
> libgnomeui rather than coming from gnome-vfs is ludicrous at best.  it's
> too late to change this stuff for 2.0, but does anyone really feel
> confident in it?  or does it not really matter?

I think it's goofy, basic problem is that gnome_program_init() is at
the wrong place in the dependency stack. But, it's really too late to
fix now.

> so anyway - does anyone have objections to putting the libglade support
> for things in the module where they come from (because i will actually
> do the work this time)?

Certainly sounds more correct, if James doesn't know of issues with
it.

Havoc