Re: pending bonobo-config problems
- From: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog linuxhall org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Gnome Hacker List <gnome-hackers gnome org>, Gnome 2 List <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: pending bonobo-config problems
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 03:29:28 +0800 (HKT)
On 10 Oct 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> How are you determining what conflicts with bonobo-conf? I don't get
> some of the conflicts you seem to be fixing:
>
> > libbonobo_configinclude_HEADERS = \
> > Bonobo_Config.h \
> > + bonobo-config-bag.h \
> > bonobo-config-database.h \
> > - bonobo-property-frame.h \
>
> bonobo-config and bonobo-conf headers are in different subdirs, so
> this should not cause conflicts.
True, I failed to tell that this patch contains other things than conflicts
too. The bonobo-property-frame.h seems to be a residue of bonobo-conf, and
is not used by bonobo-config at all. However bonobo-config-bag.h is used
but not installed.
> > -<oaf_server iid="OAFIID:Bonobo_Moniker_ditem_Factory" type="exe" location="@MONIKER_BINDIR@/bonobo-moniker-ditem">
> > +<oaf_server iid="OAFIID:Bonobo_Moniker_ditem_Factory" type="exe"
> > location="@MONIKER_BINDIR@/bonobo-moniker-ditem-2">
>
> There's no ditem in bonobo-conf that I see, so this shouldn't need renaming.
Just to keep the version of different binaries consistent. Having one
binary named version 2 and another no versioning seems strange to me :)
Abel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]