Re: Gconf glitch
- From: Ross Golder <ross golder org>
- To: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog linuxhall org>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Gnome 2 List <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Gconf glitch
- Date: 03 Oct 2001 09:53:10 +0100
On Wed, 2001-10-03 at 09:41, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> > How does this work with packaging systems? Does the symlink you get
> > depend on the order in which the packages are installed?
>
> No, 2 packages containing same file are supposed to conflict with each
> other (true even if the file concerned is symbolic link), so can't
> decide which package this symbolic should belong to. Or just don't
> include the symbolic link at all in both gconf1 and gconf2......
>
Why not have the packaging system create the symlink, in the
post-installation script.? This way both can be installed in parallel,
with no conflicts, and whichever was installed last gets the symlink.
Just an idea,
--
Ross
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]