Re: Gconf glitch

["R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog linuxhall org>]

On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

> > Well, at the moment it doesn't matter, because the two gconftools
> > support all the same things.
[......]
> > Still I hate to make people type gconftool-2 on the command line.

> How does this work with packaging systems? Does the symlink you get
> depend on the order in which the packages are installed?

No, 2 packages containing same file are supposed to conflict with each
other (true even if the file concerned is symbolic link), so can't
decide which package this symbolic should belong to. Or just don't
include the symbolic link at all in both gconf1 and gconf2......

Abel