Re: Status of gtkhtml(2)?
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>
- Cc: mjs noisehavoc org, jdub perkypants org, gnome-2-0-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Status of gtkhtml(2)?
- Date: 20 Nov 2001 16:45:37 -0500
Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM> writes:
> I do wonder however whether we should call something without an HTML
> widget and missing so many other things "2.0".
Our major numbers just mean the platform was revised incompatibly,
they don't have any other metaphysical underpinning.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
