Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- From: Michael Livshin <mlivshin bigfoot com>
- To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>, Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- Date: 17 Jun 2001 10:56:58 +0300
Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com> writes:
> bonobo-config is using monikers and the PropertyBag interface, so
> evolution will not depend on any special database backend. It would be
> even possible to use the "gconf:" moniker ;-)
excuse this stranger for butting in, but in case the above paragraph
is serious: read up on interface design. try to remember what the
"mechanism not policy" mantra really means (I'll help: it means "fuck
uniformity, I'm afraid of making policy decisions").
--
programmer, n:
A red eyed, mumbling mammal capable of conversing with inanimate
monsters.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]