Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com> writes:
> > In fact I should have a big credit in the bonobo-config docs "this is
> > a reimplementation of Havoc's GConf architecture using Bonobo-native
> > idioms."
> 
> I think the term "architecture" is a bit misleading. I am sure Miguel
> don't want to say that the overall design is bad. Instead I think he is
> talking about what you are calling implementation details (using
> CORBA_any, monikers, bonobo, ...)
> 
> Sorry if you got the impression that I do not respect your work. I have
> just added the above notice to the documentation.

OK, I was only half-serious about that, but I appreciate it. Thanks.

Havoc