Re: bonobo-config vs GConf - a summary ?

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com> writes:
>From my point of view:
> 
>  - we use the "gconf:" moniker.
>  - we use the PropertyBag interface as client side interface.
> 

Agree, I would add:

 - please write .schemas files and install them

 - if apps want to use the C API I don't intend to delete it,
   at most it becomes a b-c wrapper someday, so they should 
   feel free to use the C API (up to the app author)

Havoc