Re: TODO #1: GNOME 1.x and 2.0 interoperability



Havoc Pennington wrote:

> However, you are on crack about GConf being optional - bonobo-config
> allows a different backend, but we don't currently have a different
> backend that does the desktop-wide notification, etc., and it is not
> trivial to write one. So GConf is only theoretically optional.

We already have that backend.

> (Unless someone has been doing some serious duplication of effort
> without talking to me about it.)
>
> What bonobo-config backend do you suggest using instead?

the xmldirdb moniker

- Dietmar






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]