Re: TODO #1: GNOME 1.x and 2.0 interoperability
- From: Colm Smyth <Colm Smyth Sun COM>
- To: martin home-of-linux org, jrb redhat com
- Cc: gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, hp redhat com
- Subject: Re: TODO #1: GNOME 1.x and 2.0 interoperability
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:34:25 +0100 (BST)
(bonobo-conf is a GConf wrapper)
FYI, Havoc and/or I will take a look at the GConf 1.x/2.0 interoperability
issue mentioned below next week; follow-ups with fix/workaround details
will go to gnome-2-0-list and gconf-list.
BTW, I'd like to send on some thoughts about a proposed core schema
for GConf-configured GNOME applications; more to follow... ;)
Colm.
>Delivered-To: gnome-2-0-list gnome org
>X-Authentication-Warning: aware-of-vacuity.labs.redhat.com: jrb set sender to
jrb redhat com using -f
>To: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
>Cc: gnome-2-0-list gnome org
>Subject: Re: TODO #1: GNOME 1.x and 2.0 interoperability
>X-URL: <http://people.redhat.com/jrb>
>From: Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org> writes:
>
>> Three things need to be done:
>>
>> a) Make sure you can install GNOME 1.x and 2.0 under the same
>> prefix, currently this doesn't work.
>>
>> [Medium priority: blocks binary packages, but at the moment
>> we aren't doing any binary packages and the
>> vicious-build-scripts install everything into
>> a different prefix anyways.]
>
>This involves making the gnome-vfs branch. Is now a good time for this
>to happen?
>
>> b) OAF - make sure than you can run GNOME 2 applications with
>> the GNOME 1.x oafd and vice-versa.
>>
>> [High priority: Blocks almost everything, especially testing on a GNOME
1.x
>> desktop.]
>>
>> c) GCONF - GConf is optional in GNOME 2 since we're using bonobo-config,
>> but it needs to be fixed anyways. At the moment, you cannot start
>> any GNOME 1.x applications while the GNOME 2 gconfd is running and
>> vice-versa.
>>
>> [Low priority: GConf is optional in GNOME 2 core libraries and this is no
API
>> critical bug.
>
>Huh? Why is GConf optional??? Surely most applications will want to
>use it? And what is bonobo config?
>
>-Jonathan
>
>_______________________________________________
>gnome-2-0-list mailing list
>gnome-2-0-list gnome org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-2-0-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]