Re: why bonobo-config
- From: Ravi Pratap M <ravi che iitm ac in>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: why bonobo-config
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:42:57 +0530 (IST)
On 29 Aug 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> There are plenty of significant GNOME hackers that are not on board
> with the CORBA-everywhere plans that you have. Personally I think we
> should be focusing on the end-user desktop. Creating the ultimate
> CORBA-based app framework is interesting, but I don't think it's what
> GNOME should be about right now.
I think it's about striking the right balance. It's certainly not
possible to push a CORBA everywhere kind of thing in the current
time-frame.
> Some people want to make nice apps with a good UI that work, and fix
> problems such as xalf, cut-and-paste, keyboard navigation, control
> center, etc. - the API churn caused by the push for CORBA everywhere
> just gets in the way. Look at all the posts here where people say "I
> don't give a damn about GConf vs. bonobo-config, I just want to know
> which one to use."
A very valid point. Losing sight of this should not happen. After
all, I know the end-user in my computing facility thinks GNOME sucks for a
variety of reasons - keyboard navigation etc etc.
Cleaning up our platform and moving to an object model [ CORBA ]
is as important as getting the end-user experience right.
It's all about the balance see. Not just clean or unclean APIs
which have a whole range os issues people want to discuss all the time ;)
Regards,
Ravi
--
"If you're smart, you'll be humble. There always is somebody
who hasn't read a book and knows twice as much as you do."
-- David Duchovny in Readers' Digest
Ravi Pratap M <ravi che iitm ac in>
<http://www.iitm.ac.in/~ravi>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]