Re: Opinions on when to start Nautilus porting?

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Michael Meeks <michael ximian com> writes:
> On 24 Aug 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > Speaking of that - is it OK if I remove libIDL.m4 from the Makefile?
> > It breaks the parallel install, and PKG_CHECK_MODULES should work
> > fine.
> 
> 	Which Makefile ? I keep meaning to get round to splittin libIDL
> out from ORBit2 - since it's not changed in forever apparently, and this
> might help us a tad.
> 

ORBit2/libIDL/Makefile.am

Havoc

Index: libIDL/ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/libIDL/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.117
diff -u -p -u -r1.117 ChangeLog
--- libIDL/ChangeLog    2001/08/23 13:04:27     1.117
+++ libIDL/ChangeLog    2001/08/25 02:22:55
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2001-08-02  Havoc Pennington  <hp pobox com>
+
+       * Makefile.am: remove libIDL.m4 from build. It collided with
+       libIDL 1, and we are in a pkg-config age. If we want to keep
+       libIDL.m4 vs PKG_CHECK_MODULES(libIDL-2.0), the m4 macro 
+       needs renaming.
+
 2001-08-23  Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
 
         * libIDL/lexer.l, libIDL/parser.y,
Index: libIDL/Makefile.am
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/libIDL/Makefile.am,v
retrieving revision 1.67
diff -u -p -u -r1.67 Makefile.am
--- libIDL/Makefile.am  2001/06/23 13:29:48     1.67
+++ libIDL/Makefile.am  2001/08/25 02:22:56
@@ -47,9 +47,6 @@ libIDL_2_la_SOURCES   = parser.c parser.h 
 libIDL_2_la_LDFLAGS    = -version-info
$(LT_CURRENT):$(LT_REVISION):$(LT_AGE)  \
                          -release $(LT_RELEASE)
 
-m4datadir              = $(datadir)/aclocal
-m4data_DATA            = libIDL.m4
-
 tstidl_SOURCES         = tstidl.c
 tstidl_LDADD           = libIDL-2.la @GLIB_LIBS@