Re: IDL dependency tracking

On 16 Aug 2001, Owen Taylor wrote:
> It's ultra non-productive flame bait to simply point out that the FSF
> (authors LGPL), suggest that you include the license in each file?

	Doh sorry. What I mean is that this argument has been had before,
and there seems to be no chance that either side will agree with the
other. Clearly it's not been had while you were watching before - but it
tends to be long, tedious and counter productive.

> Well, guess that will teach me to try and be helpful...

	Please don't stop being helpful,



 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]