Re: IDL dependency tracking

Michael Meeks <michael ximian com> writes:

> 	This is ultra non-productive flame bait; clearly it should be up
> to the maintainer - the policy is clear, I'm not going to encourage people
> to commit modules to Gtk+ without the headers.

It's ultra non-productive flame bait to simply point out that the
FSF (authors LGPL), suggest that you include the license in each

Well, guess that will teach me to try and be helpful...


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]