Re: IDL dependency tracking
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, <orbit-list gnome org>, Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: IDL dependency tracking
- Date: 16 Aug 2001 12:17:14 -0400
Michael Meeks <michael ximian com> writes:
> This is ultra non-productive flame bait; clearly it should be up
> to the maintainer - the policy is clear, I'm not going to encourage people
> to commit modules to Gtk+ without the headers.
It's ultra non-productive flame bait to simply point out that the
FSF (authors LGPL), suggest that you include the license in each
file?
Well, guess that will teach me to try and be helpful...
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
