Re: orbit(2)-idl

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Mike Kestner <mkestner ameritech net> writes:
> When I was compiling the 2.0 platform, I ran across an error in the oaf
> build.  It turned out to be a symbol clash between ORBit and ORBit2 that
> was created by the oaf configure script grabbing a 1.x version of
> orbit-idl out of my path.  
> 
> I'm wondering if there is an elegant way to guard against this, or if we
> need to rename orbit-idl to orbit2-idl for 2.0?
> 

It has to be renamed - all files installed by any library must be
renamed.  Because you need to be able to install and develop against
both old and new lib simultaneously, in the same prefix.

Havoc