Re: extra app list (revision)

[James Henstridge <james daa com au>]

On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, mathieu [ chaos chaos chaos since 79 ] wrote:

> 
> Le jeu, 09 nov 2000 09:21:12, James Henstridge a écrit :
> > On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, George wrote:
> > 
> > > Your other argument that we should have 0 duplication is also not so
> > strong.
> > > For one there has already been quite a lot of duplication, and many
> > times
> > > have we shipped a duplicate, sometimes in the same package even.
> > 
> > Well, the first item on the extra apps list (gmc) is an example of a
> > program that duplicates the functionality of another app.  So if we are
> > going to disqualify gpaint for that reason, then gmc should also go :
> 
> duplicate what ? duplicate mc ?

gmc duplicates the functionality of nautilus.

What I am saying is that we already have apps in the gnome release that
duplicate the functionality of others, so this is not a good reason to
disqualify gpaint.

James.