Re: extra app list (revision)

[James Henstridge <james daa com au>]

On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, George wrote:

> Your other argument that we should have 0 duplication is also not so strong.
> For one there has already been quite a lot of duplication, and many times
> have we shipped a duplicate, sometimes in the same package even.

Well, the first item on the extra apps list (gmc) is an example of a
program that duplicates the functionality of another app.  So if we are
going to disqualify gpaint for that reason, then gmc should also go :)

James.