Re: [gnet] const correctness?



Yes, if it will build without warnings.

David


On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 15:36, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I wondered what the reason is to not have the pointer arguments whose
> contents will not be modified (e.g. buffer in gnet_conn_write())
> declared const. Will you accept patches that fix this?
> 
> Andy
-- 
David Helder - dhelder gizmolabs org - http://www.gizmolabs.org/~dhelder




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]