Re: [gnet-dev] Any plans to move more code to glib2?
- From: David Helder <dhelder umich edu>
- To: Tassos Bassoukos <abas aix meng auth gr>
- Cc: gnet-dev gnetlibrary org
- Subject: Re: [gnet-dev] Any plans to move more code to glib2?
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 18:28:53 -0400 (EDT)
What are the advantages of switching to GObject/GError? I think of
GTcpSocket as more of a GIOChannel than a GObject-thing. Or is GIOChannel
now derived from GObject? Ultimately, the question is would using
GObject/GError make GNet significantly better (in functionality) or easier
If there's huge demand for it, we can switch. We'd probably create a CVS
branch for a GNet 2.0 and implement it there.
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Tassos Bassoukos wrote:
> Hi all,
> are there any plans to support more features of glib2 in future versions
> of gnet? I was thinking of items like using signals for callbacks, GError
> support, making the sockets be GObjects etc.
> All this would make gnet of course glib2 only. Any ideas/objections? I
> would be willing to invest time and effort into this.
__ _ __ David Helder - dhelder umich edu
___/ /__ __ __(_)__/ / <http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~dhelder>
/ _ / _ `/ |/ / / _ / Jungle Monkey: <http://www.junglemonkey.net>
|_,_/|_,_/|___/_/|_,_/ Paper CD Case: <http://www.papercdcase.com>
] [Thread Prev