Re: [gmime-devel] [PATCH 5/6] Use pinentry-mode loopback in test suite when using "modern" GnuPG
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj gnome org>
- To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg fifthhorseman net>, Gmime Development <gmime-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gmime-devel] [PATCH 5/6] Use pinentry-mode loopback in test suite when using "modern" GnuPG
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 18:56:01 -0500
On 12/2/2016 11:21 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Fri 2016-12-02 11:05:59 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
+ if (strncmp (vstring, vheader, sizeof (vheader) - 1))
+ return 0;
Same. In fact, I'd probably recommend pclose()ing vpipe as soon as you
finish reading the output of gpg --version (no reason to keep it open
after reading it).
+ ret = (vstring[sizeof (vheader) - 1] > '2') ||
+ (vstring[sizeof (vheader) - 1] == '2' &&
+ vstring[sizeof (vheader)] == '.' &&
+ vstring[sizeof (vheader) + 1] >= '1');
This has the potential of reading past the end of the buffer.
ah, right. maybe we should first assert that vlen >= sizeof (vheader) ?
hm, i take it back -- how can this read past the end of the buffer if
the strncmp test above already succeeded? the first thing it reads is
at sizeof (vheader - 1), and we already know that the first vheader-1
octets match. So in the event that the buffer is too short,
vstring[sizeof (vheader) - 1] will be NULL, which is < '2', so "ret"
will be set to 0 and will never test vstring[sizeof (vheader)] or later.
--dkg
Hmmm, yea, you're right. I blame it on my lack of coffee before replying :)
Jeff
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]