multi-column relationships

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 18:36 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 18:30 +0100, Markus Bertheau ☭ wrote:
> > Also, afaics glom doesn't support multi column unique constraints - is
> > that on purpose? I think there are valid "every day" uses for multi
> > column unique constraints.
>
> Yes. I plan to maybe do that via calculated fields I think, because I'm
> used to doing that with FileMaker. But I'm not certain. It just has to
> be something simple that makes sense at the time you need to use it.
>
> I do plan for Glom to do everything that people really need in the
> simplest possible way.

Thinking about this again, we should have this explicitly in the regular
relationships definition. I'd welcome a patch to add it.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com